The property and construction industries are constantly evolving. Planning reforms, housing policy, construction costs, infrastructure investment and market conditions all influence project outcomes.
Site Intel brings together analysis, commentary and practical insights to help project teams understand the broader forces shaping development and delivery across Australia.
Permit Pending explores the realities behind housing, planning and development in Australia. From housing delivery and planning reform to project feasibility and construction challenges, each article examines the systems and decisions that influence what ultimately gets built.
Australia’s housing challenge has shifted. The issue is no longer simply a shortage of homes—it’s a market repricing risk across finance, feasibility, construction and delivery. Until projects stack commercially, policy announcements alone won’t build more housing.
Australia’s housing debate is dominated by approvals, dwelling targets and supply. But what happens when we stop measuring housing success by numbers alone and start asking whether we’re creating homes people actually want to live in?
Australia focuses heavily on housing approvals, but approved dwellings are not the same as completed homes. Explore the housing delivery chain and why approvals alone won’t solve the housing crisis.
Australia’s housing challenge is increasingly shifting from approvals to delivery and while governments continue focusing on housing targets and planning reform, many projects remain constrained by finance pressure, construction costs, labour availability and delivery risk resulting in a growing split between housing models that continue attracting capital and projects becoming harder to justify commercially.
Interest rates were supposed to cool the economy. Instead, households are borrowing less while paying more for almost everything. This week’s Permit Pending breaks down the growing pressures shaping housing delivery, development feasibility and buyer behaviour across Melbourne.
Most projects look like they should work on paper. This breakdown tests what happens when yield is pushed to fix a tight deal, and why it rarely solves the underlying problem. Feasibility, planning and delivery don’t move independently – and when they’re misaligned, increasing dwellings often just increases risk, cost and complexity instead.
Practical commentary on planning, feasibility, delivery and market conditions.
No spam. Just strategic updates, commentary on planning, feasibility, delivery and market conditions.
